 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-G71 MP2 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-G71 MP2 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-G71 MP2.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-G71 MP2 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-G71 MP2 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 58778 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3216 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 47.55 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 180 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 1.18 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G71 MP2 @ 700MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
