 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-T830 MP3 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T830 MP3 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-T830 MP3.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T830 MP3 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-T830 MP3 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 3 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 58208 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3675 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 71.4 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 332 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 2.3 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-T830 MP3 @ 950MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
