 |
Mali-450 MP4 at 700 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-450 MP4 or IMG8322.
Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 31373 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2070 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 41.73 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 125 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.6 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
