 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-T820 MP2 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark testing data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T820 MP2 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-T820 MP2.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T820 MP2 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-T820 MP2 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 53004 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 2522 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 61.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 257 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 1.67 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-T820 MP2 @ 800MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
