 |
Mali-450 at 300 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-450 @ 300MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-450 or IMG8322.
Mali-450 @ 300MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-450 @ 300MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 300 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 1 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 32014 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 4.5 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 59 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.2 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-450 @ 300MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 9
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
