|
Mali-T720 MP3 at 700 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021 Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-T720 MP3 @ 700MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-T720 MP3 or IMG8322.
Mali-T720 MP3 @ 700MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-T720 MP3 @ 700MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Frequency | 700 MHz | 510 MHz | Cores | 3 | 128 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Antutu v10 | 37900 | 36815 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2640 | 2268 | | | | GFloPS | 35.7 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 312 MT/s | 287 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 1.46 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T720 MP3 @ 700MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|