 |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz vs Mali-T820 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) or Mali-T820.
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
Mali-T820 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 1 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 21591 | 26122 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 972 | 871 | | | | | GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | 10.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 164 MT/s | 104 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.3 GP/s | 0.61 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-T820 @ 600MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
