 |
Adreno 320 at 400 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Adreno 320 or Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail).
Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 320 @ 400MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 96 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | | Antutu v10 | 32491 | 21591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 972 | | | | | GFloPS | 86.4 GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 225 MT/s | 164 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.4 GP/s | 1.3 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 320 @ 400MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
