 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Adreno 418 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Full compare data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Adreno 418 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Adreno 418.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Adreno 418 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Adreno 418 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 128 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 20 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 65900 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 2654 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 172.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 337 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 4.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Adreno 418 @ 600MHz is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
