 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 73272 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3024 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 115.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 374 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 3.84 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 600MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
