 |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz vs Mali-450 MP4 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) or Mali-450 MP4.
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 21591 | 31373 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 972 | 2070 | | | | | GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | 41.73 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 164 MT/s | 125 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.3 GP/s | 2.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-450 MP4 @ 700MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
