 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-400 MP2 at 400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Extreme benchmark examination data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-400 MP2.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 400 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 23126 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 915 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 8.4 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 55 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 0.72 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz is better: 0
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
