 |
Mali-400 at 400 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Mali-400 @ 400MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Quadrant, PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-400 or Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail).
Mali-400 @ 400MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-400 @ 400MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 1 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 40 nm | 22 nm | | Antutu v10 | 13643 | 21591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 613 | 972 | | | | | GFloPS | 3.6 GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 44 MT/s | 164 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.38 GP/s | 1.3 GP/s | | DirectX | | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-400 @ 400MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 9
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
