 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-T628 MP6 at 680 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Comprehensive compare data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T628 MP6 @ 680MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-T628 MP6.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T628 MP6 @ 680MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-T628 MP6 @ 680MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 680 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 50683 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3212 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 176 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 520 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 5.2 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Mali-T628 MP6 @ 680MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
