 |
Mali-400 MP2 at 500 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Full compare data of Mali-400 MP2 @ 500MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-400 MP2 or IMG8322.
Mali-400 MP2 @ 500MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-400 MP2 @ 500MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 24911 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 1120 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 9 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 42 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.08 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-400 MP2 @ 500MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
