 |
Mali-450 MP4 at 600 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-450 MP4 @ 600MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Vellamo, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-450 MP4 or IMG8322.
Mali-450 MP4 @ 600MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-450 MP4 @ 600MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 28906 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2056 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 35.77 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 112 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.8 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-450 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
