 |
Mali-T860 MP2 at 350 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Mali-T860 MP2 @ 350MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-T860 MP2 or IMG8322.
Mali-T860 MP2 @ 350MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T860 MP2 @ 350MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 350 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 40021 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 1774 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 23.76 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 85 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.65 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T860 MP2 @ 350MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
