 |
Mali-T760 MP2 at 700 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-T760 MP2 @ 700MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-T760 MP2 or Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail).
Mali-T760 MP2 @ 700MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T760 MP2 @ 700MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | | Antutu v10 | 41708 | 21591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2731 | 972 | | | | | GFloPS | 47.6 GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 179 MT/s | 164 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.68 GP/s | 1.3 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T760 MP2 @ 700MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
