 |
Adreno 320 at 400 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Full comparison data of Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Adreno 320 or IMG8322.
Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 320 @ 400MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 128 | | Shaders | 96 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 32491 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 86.4 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 225 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.4 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 320 @ 400MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
