 |
Mali-T720 MP4 at 600 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-T720 MP4 or IMG8322.
Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 39468 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 48 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 386 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.2 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T720 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
