 |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz vs Mali-400 MP2 at 400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Full comparison data of Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) or Mali-400 MP2.
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 400 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 40 nm | | Antutu v10 | 21591 | 23126 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 972 | 915 | | | | | GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | 8.4 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 164 MT/s | 55 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.3 GP/s | 0.72 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-400 MP2 @ 400MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
