 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-T820 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-T820.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-T820 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 1 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 26122 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 871 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 10.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 104 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 0.61 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-T820 @ 600MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
