 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 60399 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3153 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 96 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 312 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 3.2 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
