 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-T830 MP2 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Full compare data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T830 MP2 @ 900MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-T830 MP2.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T830 MP2 @ 900MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-T830 MP2 @ 900MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 900 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 52715 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3411 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 61.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 257 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 1.67 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-T830 MP2 @ 900MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
