|
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz vs Mali-T720 MP2 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021 Comprehensive compare data of Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-T720 MP2 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) or Mali-T720 MP2.
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs Mali-T720 MP2 @ 600MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
Mali-T720 MP2 @ 600MHz |
Frequency | 500 MHz | 600 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | Antutu v10 | 21591 | 28458 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 972 | 1507 | | | | GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | 20.4 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 164 MT/s | 200 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 1.3 GP/s | 1.25 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-T720 MP2 @ 600MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|