 |
Mali-450 at 300 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Mali-450 @ 300MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-450 or Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail).
Mali-450 @ 300MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-450 @ 300MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 300 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 1 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 40 nm | 22 nm | | Antutu v10 | 32014 | 21591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 972 | | | | | GFloPS | 4.5 GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 59 MT/s | 164 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.2 GP/s | 1.3 GP/s | | DirectX | | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-450 @ 300MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
