 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Full comparison data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell).
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 72280 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3112 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 134 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 396 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 4.02 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) @ 600MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
