 |
Adreno 320 at 450 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Full comparison data of Adreno 320 @ 450MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Adreno 320 or IMG8322.
Adreno 320 @ 450MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 320 @ 450MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 450 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 128 | | Shaders | 96 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 31542 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 97.2 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 253 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.7 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 320 @ 450MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
