 |
Adreno 302 at 400 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Adreno 302 @ 400MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Adreno 302 or Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail).
Adreno 302 @ 400MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 302 @ 400MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 24 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | | Antutu v10 | 14506 | 21591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 696 | 972 | | | | | GFloPS | 19.2 GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 66 MT/s | 164 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.8 GP/s | 1.3 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 302 @ 400MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
