 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-G71 MP2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-G71 MP2 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-G71 MP2.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-G71 MP2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-G71 MP2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 63323 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3586 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 64.53 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 244 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 6.4 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G71 MP2 @ 950MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
