 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 67033 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 3055 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 179 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 492 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 6.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 700MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
