|
Mali-T720 at 450 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021 Ultimate benchmark testing data of Mali-T720 @ 450MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-T720 or IMG8322.
Mali-T720 @ 450MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-T720 @ 450MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Frequency | 450 MHz | 510 MHz | Cores | 1 | 128 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Antutu v10 | 19552 | 36815 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 1284 | 2268 | | | | GFloPS | 7.65 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 78 MT/s | 287 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 0.46 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T720 @ 450MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|