 |
Mali-G68 MP5 at 950 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023 Hardcore benchmark testing data of Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP5 or Apple A12X Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
Frequency | 950 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 5 | 7 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Antutu v10 | 610701 | 653237 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 18183 | | | | GFloPS | 1026 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 304 MT/s | 610 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 148 GP/s | 15 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 12 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|