 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G68 MP5 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Comprehensive compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G68 MP5.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 610701 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1026 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 304 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 148 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
