 |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz vs Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GFXBench, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A15 Bionic GPU or Mali-G78AE.
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 3232 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 841256 | 732270 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1233 MT/s | 2652 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 39.23 GP/s | 92.62 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
