 |
Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G78AE or Apple A12X Bionic.
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 7 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 732270 | 653237 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19040 | 18183 | | | | | GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2652 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92.62 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
