 |
Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G78AE or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 732270 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19040 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2652 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92.62 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
