 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Maximum benchmark testing data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or Mali-G78AE.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1268278 | 732270 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 33860 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 2652 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 92.62 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
