|
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023 Full comparison data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G78AE.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
Frequency | 3640 MHz | 700 MHz | Cores | 6 | 24 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 732270 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19040 | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2652 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 92.62 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|