 |
Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GFXBench, Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, PCMark, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G78AE or Apple A12 Bionic.
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 732270 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19040 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2652 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92.62 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
