 |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021 Hardcore benchmark examination data of Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G76 3EEMC4 or Mali-G76 MP18.
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz |
Frequency | 900 MHz | 950 MHz | Cores | 4 | 18 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Antutu v10 | 296060 | 351261 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 8159 | 9741 | | | | GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | 581.14 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 516 MT/s | 1357 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 5.45 GP/s | 38.97 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|