 |
Adreno 642L at 550 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 22-08-2021
Full comparison data of Adreno 642L @ 550MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Adreno 642L or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Adreno 642L @ 550MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 642L @ 550MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
| Frequency | 550 MHz | 900 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 512 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 507648 | 296060 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 16978 | 8159 | | | | | GFloPS | 906.58 GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 391 MT/s | 516 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.63 GP/s | 5.45 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 642L @ 550MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
