 |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
| Frequency | 820 MHz | 900 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 296060 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 8159 | | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 516 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 5.45 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
