 |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as GFXBench, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G76 3EEMC4 or Apple A12 Bionic.
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 900 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 296060 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 8159 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 516 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 5.45 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
