 |
Mali-G52 MP2 at 614 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Neocore, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 MP2 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
| Frequency | 614 MHz | 900 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 211843 | 296060 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 8159 | | | | | GFloPS | 302.51 GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 485 MT/s | 516 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.8 GP/s | 5.45 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
