 |
Mali-G57 MC2 at 950 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 24-01-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MC2 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 900 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 308465 | 296060 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 8159 | | | | | GFloPS | 486 GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 368 MT/s | 516 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.1 GP/s | 5.45 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
