 |
Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-08-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MC4 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Shaders | 128 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 509737 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12756 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 320 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
