 |
Mali-G68 MP6 at 700 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 26-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP6 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 589642 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 684 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2120 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
