 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1268278 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 33860 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
