 |
Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Ultimate benchmark testing data of Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G710 MP16 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 650 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 738743 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 20145 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2648 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
